The first thing that struck me as an undergraduate in biology was how many females science majors there were. I have been told time and time again that females are discouraged and discriminated against in the field of science. As undergraduates I believe that women do as well as there male counterparts in science. At
For women like me, who are striving for success in the field of science the possibility of discrimination is an important concern. If women are truly genetically disadvantaged in science does that mean that women should concentrate on subjects more focused in the humanities? Yet at the same time if women are not at a genetic disadvantage, and outperform men in universities in science then why are women less successful after university when it comes to obtaining tenured positions and getting grants for research? One genetic difference that definitely might hold many women back from the ages of 25 to 35 is that many of them are pressured to or want to have children. Though, it seems like women are punished in the scientific field, as if it is a weakness that they want children.
Most parties share a common interest in the drive to find out the reason why women are not as successful in science. The issue of women in science is very important today, because there are so many women in science, who are relatively successful, and do not want to face discrimination after university, or find that they are just not innately capable of the work required for positions of tenure and grants for research.
This essay would explore the many different perspectives on women in science, and why women are at a disadvantage in science starting from a young age all the way up to their entrance into the workforce. I could interview some of the female biology teachers at
No comments:
Post a Comment